average deployment success over the original mixed policy.
Behavior Uncloning
Distilling Mode Redirection into Policy Weights without Inference-Time Steering
1Texas A&M University 2University of Wisconsin 3Northwestern University 4Stanford University † Project Lead
Behavior Uncloning in 80 seconds.
Distilling mode redirection into policy weights.
Behavior-cloned policies often learn multiple behavior modes from demonstration datasets, including modes that are unsafe, inconvenient, or otherwise undesired at deployment. Standard remedies such as data curation and inference-time steering either require full retraining or add extra computation to every control step.
MoRE redirects policy rollouts toward desired behavior modes through a short uncloning step. A behavior-mode classifier supplies a differentiable redirection signal during editing, while a retain loss preserves desired-mode competence. After editing, the classifier is no longer needed: the updated policy runs through the same inference path as the original policy.
simulated and real-world tasks across manipulation and navigation.
editing gradient steps per target setting in our evaluations.
extra inference-time steering modules after the edit.
Differentiable mode-redirection editor.
MoRE treats behavior mode control as a policy editing problem. It uses mode-labeled examples to train a mode classifier, then distills the desired redirection into the policy weights so the final policy can be deployed without an auxiliary steering module.
Train a mode classifier
Fit a K-way classifier on features cached from the original mixed policy.
Redirect undesired samples
Use differentiable policy features to move probability mass toward the desired mode set.
Preserve task competence
Keep the original imitation loss on desired-mode samples and deploy the edited policy by itself.
Mode edits transfer to physical robot tasks.
Across four real-robot tasks with a Franka Research 3 arm, MoRE shifts rollouts toward requested behavior modes while preserving task completion.
Knife handover
SR: 45.0 → 70.0 (+25.0). Clip: original vs. MoRE-edited rollouts handing the knife to a person.
| Task | Mode change | Original Avg SR | MoRE Avg SR | SR Gain (pp) | MoRE TCR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Place-Knife | 2 → 1 | 40.0% | 80.0% | +40.0 | 80.0% |
| Place-Bottle | 3 → 1 | 31.7% | 96.7% | +65.0 | 96.7% |
| Block-Obstacle | 2 → 1 | 47.5% | 92.5% | +45.0 | 92.5% |
| Knife-Handover (VLA) | 2 → 1 | 45.0% | 70.0% | +25.0 | 85.0% |
Values report average real-robot SR over target modes. Place-Bottle also supports a 3 → 2 edit, improving SR from 50.0% to 100.0%.
Choose a mode. The policy follows.
Each simulated task admits several behavior modes. The original policy spreads its rollouts across all of them; a MoRE edit keeps the target mode you pick and removes the rest, with the same inference path.
MoRE vs. adaptation and steering baselines
Deployment success rate (SR, %) averaged over target modes, Diffusion Policy benchmark. DynaGuide steers at inference time and runs at 8.47× the original latency; CPL and MoRE edit the weights and keep the original latency. The dashed marker is the filtered-retrain reference, a policy retrained from scratch on mode-filtered demonstrations.
| Task | Modes | Original Avg SR | MoRE Avg SR | SR Gain (pp) | MoRE TCR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Push-T | left or right | 50.0% | 98.3% | +48.3 | 98.7% |
| Push-Wall | left or right | 37.0% | 80.7% | +43.7 | 80.7% |
| Push-Pillars | four routes | 21.5% | 72.3% | +50.8 | 80.7% |
| Quadruped | left or right | 50.0% | 84.3% | +34.3 | 84.7% |
Values report average deployment success rate (SR) and task completion rate (TCR) over target modes.
Rollout grids across the evaluation suite.
The supplementary video walks through the evaluation suite: rollout grids for each simulated and real-robot task under the original and MoRE-edited policies, and the compared baselines.
Authors.
Cite this work.
If you find Behavior Uncloning useful, please consider citing:
@misc{wang2026behavioruncloning,
title={Behavior Uncloning: Distilling Mode Redirection into Policy Weights without Inference-Time Steering},
author={Hao Wang and Jiuzhou Lei and Dayou Li and Bangya Liu and Minghui Zheng and Manling Li and Ruohan Zhang and Zhiwen Fan},
year={2026},
eprint={2606.29201},
archivePrefix={arXiv},
primaryClass={cs.RO},
url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.29201},
}